La tecnologÃa que mueve a las grandes producciones cinematográficas
ago 27, 2007 7:25 am Cine
Existen tecnologÃas, que tal vez en la vida las podamos probar, pero es bueno saber qué se ha utilizado, por ejemplo en la pelÃcula 300:
Post production took almost a year. The film was edited on an Avid, with an HD cut also maintained in Final Cut Pro The 3D was made using Maya, XSI, and Lightwave The 2D composites were made with Shake, Inferno, Fusion, and Combustion. The filmmakers prefer Macintosh, but large portions of the movie were made under Linux. Asset management was handled by custom software written in the Panorama development environment, made by Provue. Color management was handled by Truelight software. The film was scanned on a northlight scanner and was recorded on the arrilaser. Most of the film was shot at high speed, between 50 and 150fps. Normal film is at 24fps. The film was transferred to HD SR tape and quicktime, and HD quicktimes were the basis for the HD preview cuts. The working resolution for the film was 2K, at a working aspect ratio of 2.11:1 and a projected aspect ratio of 2.39:1.
Tweet⇔ ⇔
:: temas que pueden estar relacionados ::
agosto 28, 2007 at 12:13 pm
agosto 27, 2007 at 12:29 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7qKD-Ph7ds
300 a la mexicana…
Salu2.
agosto 27, 2007 at 12:21 pm
Qué malditas ansias de querer criticarlo todo. Si no te gusta a tàalgo, pues no lo consumas, y ya.
Al menos técnicamente, el cacho que he visto de 300 (es que me dormàcomo a la mitad, la estaba viendo como a las 3 AM hace poco…) se ve muy bien.
Ya de si es basura o no, simplemente en gustos se rompen géneros.
Y me gustó más Megan Fox:
http://www.beyondhollywood.com/posterx/transformers-megan-fox-070518-1.jpg
Salu2.
agosto 27, 2007 at 10:19 am
agosto 27, 2007 at 10:03 am
SI EL QUE LO ESCRIBE FUE EL PRIMERO EN CRITICAR ESTA PELICULA (300) TACHANDOLA DE ¨X¨…
AL FINAL VEO QUE A MUCHA GENTE LE GUSTA LA BASURA COMO LO FUE TRANSFORMERS DONDE SE USO EXCELENTE TECNOLOGIA PARA CREAR… BASURA…
agosto 27, 2007 at 8:58 am